Five Reasons Why a Home Sparkling Water Brand Built a New Culture in Japan — Backed by Data and Real Voices
- kei isa
- 2025年10月11日
- 読了時間: 3分
更新日:2025年10月11日
Introduction
This article is based on my own direct experience launching a home sparkling water brand in Japan. It reflects the trial and error of working closely with consumers and the market, and the insights we gained as a result.
For many years, the Japanese viewed carbonated drinks as “special beverages” such as soda or alcohol mixers. But recently, ideas like “sugar-free sparkling water at home” and “a lifestyle without buying PET bottles” have become increasingly common. One particular brand played a central role in this shift. Here, I will explore how this transformation happened — using data, user feedback, and media perspectives.
Table of Contents
Health Consciousness and the Proposal of a New Habit
Building a Distribution and Infrastructure Network for Gas Cylinders
Visualizing Environmental Issues with a Persuasive Message
Concrete Economic Value — The Real “Savings” Consumers Experience
Real User Voices and a Balanced View of Challenges
1. Health Consciousness and the Proposal of a New Habit
Japan has seen a steady trend toward reducing sugar and sweetened drinks, particularly among women in their 20s to 40s. This brand tapped into that shift by promoting sparkling water as part of a healthier lifestyle.
The growing popularity of highballs (whisky and soda) also supported the idea that “quality carbonation at home” could be a new standard. Some consumers even began to drink sparkling water on its own.
Media coverage further reinforced this trend, with stories about “sparkling water diets” and “digestive benefits.” Lifestyle and beauty magazines highlighted routines like “one glass of sparkling water every morning” to reduce swelling and improve digestion.
2. Building a Distribution and Infrastructure Network for Gas Cylinders
By the mid-2010s, the brand’s products were available in more than 3,000 retail locations across Japan, including electronics retailers, supermarkets, and warehouse clubs.
One gas cylinder produces about 60 liters of sparkling water — equivalent to 120 bottles of 500ml sparkling water.
Crucially, the company established domestic filling facilities. This eliminated the need to ship empty cylinders overseas for refilling, reduced transport energy, shortened supply times, and stabilized costs.
3. Visualizing Environmental Issues with a Persuasive Message
In 2022, the brand announced that it had eliminated 5 billion single-use PET bottles worldwide.
Its campaigns in Japan used clear slogans like “Say goodbye to bottles and cans,” emphasizing that a single reusable bottle could replace more than 1,000 PET bottles.
Data showed that if 20% of Japanese households used the product, annual plastic waste could be reduced by about 344,000 tons — around 13–14% of the Ministry of the Environment’s 2030 plastic reduction target.
4. Concrete Economic Value — The Real “Savings” Consumers Experience
According to one five-year user review, a 500ml bottle of store-bought sparkling water costs about 100 yen, while the same amount made at home costs only about 20 yen.
Heavy users reported that the initial investment (starter kit and cylinders) could be recovered within 12–18 months.
Beyond cost, many users valued the non-monetary savings: no longer carrying heavy bottles from the store, and no longer managing piles of PET waste. These practical conveniences reinforced the brand’s appeal.
5. Real User Voices and a Balanced View of Challenges
Positive feedback:
“I use it every day. I love being able to adjust the strength of carbonation.”
“I no longer have to carry bottles, and the amount of PET trash in my house has dropped significantly.”
“The design is stylish, and attaching the bottle is simple and quick.”
Critical feedback:
Some reported that the carbonation was weaker than expected, though often due to water temperature or cylinder usage.
The standard 1L bottle was too large for single users, who preferred 500ml sizes.
Premium models priced around ¥30,000 were considered expensive, creating a barrier for some consumers.
The process of exchanging cylinders, especially when ordering online, was seen as inconvenient.
Conclusion
The success of this home sparkling water brand in Japan came not just from selling a product, but from making environmental value visible, building reliable infrastructure, and demonstrating both financial and lifestyle benefits that consumers could truly feel.
While challenges and criticisms existed, the brand addressed them and stayed consistent in its message. As a result, it didn’t remain a passing trend — it helped establish a sustainable sparkling water culture in Japan, where none had existed before.



コメント